← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3786/2016disposed

Arun Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-14Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3786 of 2016 ====================================================== Arun Yadav, Son of Late Jainarayan Yadav, Resident of village- Dumna, P.S. + P.O.- Bihra, District- Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Vibhag, Patna

2. District Magistrate, Saharsa

3. Divisional Commissioner, Saharsa

4. District Panchayati Raj Officer, Saharsa

5. Deputy Director, Panchayati Raj, Kosi Division, Saharsa

6. Block Development Officer, Sattar Kataiya, District- Saharsa

7. Munni Devi, Wife of Madan Paswan, Resident of Daurna, P.O. + P.S.- Bihra, District- Saharsa, at present Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Autaihi under Block Sattar Karaiya, District- Saharsa

8. Panchayat Sachiv Aukahi, Block Sattar Kataiya, District- Saharsa .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Shahnawaz Ali, Advocate For Respondent Nos.1 to 6 : Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, A.C. to PAAG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 14-03-2016 Heard Mr. Md. Shahnawaz Ali, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kumar Singh, learned Assistant Counsel to Principal Additional Advocate General, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to take recourse to appropriate provisions of law.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3786 of 2016 (2) dt.14-03-2016 2/2 No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to take recourse to appropriate provisions of law including, if so advised, institute appropriate suit in a Court of competent jurisdiction.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U