Dhirendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50324 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2021 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== BHOGENDRA YADAV S/o Late Guneshwar Yadav Resident of VillageJagur, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 50645 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2021 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== DHIRENDRA YADAV S/o Bhogendra Yadav Resident of Village- Ward No. 11, Jagur, P.S.- Triveniganj, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 50324 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kritya Nand Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jagdhar Prasad (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 50645 of 2022) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kritya Nand Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 16-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 144, 149, 447, 594, 341, 323, 324, 307, 509, 325, 354(B), 379, 380 of the Indian Penal Code. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioners along with 15-16 other co-accused persons, variously armed, entered into the house of the informant and started to abuse and assault his family members. Specific allegation against petitioner Bhogendra Yadav is of assaulting causing fracture on his left

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50324 of 2022(3) dt.16-01-2023 2/2 hand and allegation against the petitioner is of assaulting on the head of victim Anandi Yadav by means of Farsa causing cut injury.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to land dispute. There is case and counter case. Members of both parties have sustained injuries as alleged in separate incident. Both petitioners have been languishing in judicial custody for about six months.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM 1st, Supaul in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 263 of 2021.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U