Jagdish Paswan @ Jitendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52572 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2023 Thana- NATIONAL HIGHWAY DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== Jagdish Paswan @ Jitendra Paswan Son of Late Yogendra Paswan R/O Vill.- Bhagwanpur, Kaiju, P.S.- Patepur, Dist.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manish Chandra Gandhi For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-10-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Bangara @ N.H. Bangra P.S. Case No. 172 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 356, 379 of the I.P.C. but later on Section 411 of the I.P.C. and Sections 356, 379 and 411 of the I.P.C.
3. As per allegation, two unknown persons boarded on motorcycle intercepted the informant and snatched his bag containing Tab, Biomatric, Chair and mobile and fled away.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that the articles which were recovered on the basis of confessional statement of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52572 of 2024(3) dt.01-10-2024 2/2 petitioner, were not put on TIP. The petitioner is under custody since 16.03.2024.
5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner has confessed his guilt by giving vivid description of the entire occurrence and on his disclosure, the stolen articles were recovered behind the house of the petitioner. He is involved in a number of cases of similar nature.
6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances as well as the gravity of the allegation and also the fact that the petitioner has criminal antecedents, I do not think it to be a fit case for bail, which is hereby rejected. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T