Kiran Devi @ Kiran Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6687 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2007 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== KIRAN DEVI @ KIRAN KUMARI W/o Manoj Chaudhary, D/o Late Yadunandan Singh R/o Village- Dania Rasulpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, DistrictBegusarai at present R/o Village- Madhurapur Purwari Tola, P.S.- Teghra, District- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Atul Chandra, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioner is apprehended his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 and 120(B) of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. This is a case of murder of one Jogendra Singh by the accused persons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6687 of 2021(3) dt.04-01-2022 2/2 further submits that in the trial started against other co-accused persons in Sessions Trial No. 186 of 2019, altogether six PWs were examined by prosecution party who named this petitioner and levelled contradictory statement to each other against petitioner. He further submits that on the basis of aforesaid evidence petitioner was summoned under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. He further submits that petitioner was only order giver and he has clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-XIII, Begusarai in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 52 of 2007, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U T