J M C Projects India Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2137 of 2017 ====================================================== J M C Projects India Ltd. Son of Late A.L. Shaw, resident of Flat no. 703, Wing-C, Akruli Road, Plot No. 16, Lohkhandwala Foundation School, Anita Vihar, Kandivali East, P.O.P.S. Samta Nagar, Mumbai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Patna having its office at Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2.

Executive Engineer, PH Division, Bhagalpur East, Public Health Engineering Department, Govt. of Bi ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2482 of 2017 ====================================================== J M C Projects India Ltd. Son of Late A.L. Shaw, resident of Flat no. 703, Wing-C, Akruli Road, Plot No.-16, Lohkhandwaka Foundation School, Anita Vihar, Kandivali East P.O. P.S. Samta Nagar, Mumbai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bihar, Patna having its office at Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2.

Rites Limited, a Government of India Enterprise having its Office at RITES Bhawan, Flat No. 2, Sect ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2137 of 2017) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.D.V.Pathy For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Lalit Kishore -Paag1 (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2482 of 2017) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.D.V.Pathy For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vikash Kumar- Sc11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 31-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2137 of 2017(8) dt.31-01-2020 2/2 Petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:- i) the respondent no. 2 be directed to deduct tax at source at prescribed rates only on the value of materials used in the execution of the works contract.

ii) for granting any other relief(s) to which the petitioner is otherwise found entitled to.

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the writ petitions for the reasons that it has become infructuous. The writ petitions stand disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Tiwary/-Ajay/- U