Suvransu Mitra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1898 of 2010 ====================================================== Suvransu Mitra, son of Debi Prasad Mitra, for M/S Archii Printing & Packaging Pvt. Ltd., 11/1 Sunny Park, Juthika Apartment, 1st Floor, Kolkata .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Directorate of I.C.D.S. Social Welfare Deptt., Govt. of Bihar

2. Director, Integrated Child Development Services, Bihar, 2nd Floor, Indira Bhawan, R.C. Singh Path, Opp. Baily Road, Patna-800001, Bihar

3. Procurement Officer Directorate of I.C.D.S., Patna, Bihar

4. Principal Secretary Social Welfare Deptt., Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna-800001, Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Bishwa Bihuti Kumar Singh, AC to PAAG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-02-2015 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in support of the present writ petition. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents for payment of his dues, which have been indicated in paragraph no.1 of the writ petition. Learned AC to PAAG, Bihar, Patna, by referring to the averments made in the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no.2, has opposed the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. He has pointed out that in paragraph no.5 of the aforesaid counter affidavit, it has been stated that the entire admissible dues have already been paid to the petitioner and nothing remains to be paid to him further.

A copy of the aforesaid counter affidavit was served upon the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner way back on 23.08.2010, but till date no rejoinder affidavit has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.1898 of 2010 (3) dt.10-02-2015 filed on behalf of the petitioner controverting the averments made in the aforesaid counter affidavit.

In above view of the matter, it is apparent that the present writ petition has become now infructuous, as the admissible dues have already been paid to the petitioner. In the result, the writ petition has to fail and is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) Arvind/- U