Prince Kumar @ Prince Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48945 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Rohtas ====================================================== Prince Kumar @ Prince Kumar Sharma son of Santosh Sharma Resident of Village -Indour Police Station -Dinara District -Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 31-10-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Rohtas (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025 registered for the offences under Sections 303(2), 319(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 66(C) and 66(D) of the IT Act, 2008.
3. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 06.06.2025.
4. As per FIR, petitioner along with other co-accused persons were involved in cyber fraud, cheating innocent people through online transactions.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that name of petitioner transpired in the present case on the basis of disclosure as made by apprehended co-accused namely Gautam Kumar. It is pointed out that save and except suspicion arising out of disclosure nothing incriminating appears, which may prima-facie suggest his involvement with the present crime in question. It is pointed out that no alleged amount was received by this petitioner which may prima-facie suggest his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48945 of 2025(3) dt.31-10-2025 2/2 involvement. While concluding the argument it is submitted that, petitioner is a man of clean antecedent and moreover, investigation of this case has already completed, and as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
6. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State, opposes the prayer for bail.
7. In view of aforesaid factual submission and by taking note of fact as save and except suspicion arising out of disclosure made by apprehended co-accused as discussed aforesaid primafacie nothing appears incriminating, coupled with the fact as petitioner remains in custody since 06.06.2025, accordingly above named petitioner, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Rohtas (Cyber) P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.) S.Tripathi/- U T