← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/441/2017disposed

Kaushal Kishore Verma v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. Pankaj Kumar Secretary Road Construction Department And ORS

2019-07-03Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.441 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12529 of 2013 ====================================================== Kaushal Kishore Verma Son of Late Kameshwar Prasad, resident of MohallaRajiv Nagar, Road No. 8, P.O.- Keshrinagar, P.S.- Rajiv Nagar, DistrictPatna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through Mr. Pankaj Kumar Secretary Road Construction Department, Nirman Bhawan, Bailey Road, P.S. Shastinagar, Dist.Patna. 2.

Mr. Laxmi Naryan Das Engineer in Chief Road Construction Department, Nirman Bhawan, Bailey Road, P.S. Shastinagar, Dist. Patna. 3.

Mr. Bhawani Nandan Chief Engineer, South Bihar Road Construction Department, Nirman Bhawan, Bailey Road, P.S. Shastinagar, Dist. Patna. 4.

Mr. Janardan Prasad Singh, Kashyap Superintending Engineer, Magadh Road, Construction Circle, P.S. Gaya, Dist. Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajiv Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballav Prasad Yadav, AAG11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

At this juncture, this Court is not giving any direction as has been stated by the State that the enquiry proceeding is going on but, the petitioner is not participating in the same and, on that account, the proceeding has not been completed, submitting that the entire payment will be made subject to final result of the departmental proceeding.

In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to cooperate in the early disposal of the enquiry proceeding which

Patna High Court MJC No.441 of 2017(4) dt.03-07-2019 2/2 he undertakes. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Enquiry Officer who will conduct the enquiry on dayto-day basis and conclude the same expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of appearance, will submit the enquiry report accordingly, in turn, within one month thereafter, the Disciplinary Authority cum Appointing Authority will take a decision in accordance with law.

Any payment made to the petitioner will be subject to the final result of the enquiry proceeding.

With the aforementioned observation, this contempt petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U