Baidynath Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46894 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2018 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.
Baidynath Sahni Son of Late Yogi Sahni Resident of Village - Tiswara, P.S.- Sarai Ranjan, Distt - Samastipur.
2.
Ram Vilas Thakur @ Ram Bilash Thakur Son of Baleshwar Thakur Resident of Village - Tiswara, P.S.- Sarai Ranjan, Distt - Samastipur. 3.
Pradeep Sahni Son of Late Ram Dayal Sahni Resident of Village - Tiswara, P.S.- Sarai Ranjan, Distt - Samastipur.
4.
Suresh Sahni Son of Late Saheb Sahni Resident of Village - Tiswara, P.S.- Sarai Ranjan, Distt - Samastipur.
5.
Kapildev Sahni @ Kapildeo Sahni Son of Late Rameshwar Sahni Resident of Village - Tiswara, P.S.- Sarai Ranjan, Distt - Samastipur. 6.
Jagdish Sahni Son of Late Mangal Sahni Resident of Village - Tiswara, P.S.- Sarai Ranjan, Distt - Samastipur.
7.
Ranjit Sahni @ Ranjeet Sahni Son of Late Sonelal Sahni Resident of Village - Tiswara, P.S.- Sarai Ranjan, Distt - Samastipur. 8.
Lootan Sahni @ Lutan Sahni Son of Late Saheb Sahni Resident of Village - Tiswara, P.S.- Sarai Ranjan, Distt - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kumar Praveen, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 29-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sarai Ranjan P.S. Case No.62 of 2018 for allegedly having committed the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 283, 291, 323, 332, 336, 337, 341, 353, 427, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that only because there was some obstructions on N.H.103 in protest against some occurrence in that area, the petitioners have been named in connection with the present case along
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46894 of 2019(2) dt.29-07-2019 2/2 with 26 named persons. It is further submitted that six other similarly situated co-accused persons have since been extended the privilege of anticipatory bail by the court below itself in A.B.P. No.834 of 2019 and the petitioners' case also stands on similar footing.
In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances and there being no specific allegation against the petitioners, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Samastipur, in connection with Sarai Ranjan P.S. Case No.62 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T