Nihal @ Nawed v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5507 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -769 Year- 2014 Thana -ARARIA District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Nihal @ Nawed Son of Quashim Resident of village - Chakardau, P.S. Araria, District - Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Ziaul Quamar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kr. Panday (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 10-02-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Araria P.S. Case No. 769 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Section 393 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant alleged that two persons made an attempt to rob his mobile and laptop. On alarm, Shahnawaj was apprehended on the spot and he disclosed the name of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He runs a shop. The name of the petitioner figured in the case in the confessional statement of co-accused.

It appears that Shahnawaj was apprehended on the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5507 of 2015 (2) dt.10-02-2015 spot, but the petitioner managed to flee away. Shahnawaj disclosed the name of the petitioner.

Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that the name of the petitioner was disclosed by the accused who was apprehended at the spot, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) KKSINHA/- U T