Ghanshyam Kumar @ Juanka @ Junka v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48271 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-382 Year-2024 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Ghanshyam Kumar @ Juanka @ Junka S/O Surendra Singh @ Sulo Singh Resident of Vill.- Jinedpur, Ward no. 05, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-08-2025 Heard Mr. Arvind Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar , learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 382 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 314(4) of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner, a bike was recovered. He could not show the documents of the bike and confessed that the same bike is stolen one.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that though this case has been lodged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48271 of 2025(2) dt.08-08-2025 2/2 against this petitioner under Section 414 as well, but there is no complain of theft of the bike. The case of the prosecution bases only on the confessional statement of this petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 03.11.2024.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedent of six cases out of which five cases are of similar nature.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with a condition that the petitioner shall not indulge in similar nature of offences in future. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 382 of 2024. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T