Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6069 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2020 Thana- DIGHWARA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Raushan Kumar Son of Mahesh Sah Resident of Village- Jalal, P.S.- Dighwara, Distt- Saran 2.

Rohit Kumar Son of Mahesh Sah Resident of Village- Jalal, P.S.- Dighwara, Distt- Saran 3.

Rahul Kumar Son of Mahesh Sah Resident of Village- Basti Jalal, P.S.- Dighwara, Distt- Saran ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 07-01-2022 Heard both the parties through video conferencing. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No.199/2020 instituted for the offences under Sections 363 and 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are young persons and there is no criminal antecedent. The F.I.R. has been lodged only with the sole purpose to arrest the petitioners. The lady is not to be found since several days and the F.I.R. has been lodged belatedly. Taking into consideration that the petitioners are

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6069 of 2021(3) dt.07-01-2022 2/2 named in the F.I.R. and the abducted person is required to be recovered, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners and the same is accordingly dismissed. (Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) amit/- U T