← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/269/2017disposed

Rajnish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Mr. R. K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development

2018-09-19Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.269 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12135 of 2013 ====================================================== Rajnish Kumar, Son of late Surendra Sharma, Resident of Village- Salempur, P.S. Sakurabad, District- Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Mr. R. K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. Mr. M. Ramchandrudu, the Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh the District Magistrate, Jehanabad.

4. Mr. Sachidanand Prasad, the District Education Officer (DEO) Jehanabad.

5. Mr. Ranjit Paswan, District Programme officer(ESTT). Jehanabad.

6. Mr. Muzib Ansari, the Block Education Extension Officer, Jehanabad. ... ... Opposite parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey, AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order, which has been passed by the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Jehanabad, is not in consonance with the order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No.12135 of 2013, but de hors to the order passed in the case of Vishwanath Pandey v. State of Bihar and Others, reported in 2013(3) PLJR 305 S.C., which has been clarified in the case of Mukesh and another vs. the State of Bihar and others, reported in 2017 (2) PLJR 263 SC.

Patna High Court MJC No.269 of 2017(4) dt.19-09-2018 2/2 As the authority has already passed the order, the petitioner, if so advised, may take legal course against the order passed by the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Jehanabad. Accordingly, this contempt petition is disposed of. (Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U