Bachchan Thakur v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6737 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -187 Year- 2014 Thana -KALYANPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Bachchan Thakur Son of Late Chulhai Thakur Resident of Village - Bagahi Bhagwanpur, P.s.- Kalyanpur, District - East Champaran, .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Munni Devi Daughter of Mulan Thakur Resident of Village - Tajpur, P.S.- Keshariya, District - East Champaran .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Chandra Prasad (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2015 Heard both sides.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 187 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
The wife of the petitioner made allegation that the petitioner put forth additional demand of dowry of Rs. 2,50,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage was solemnized about 15 years ago and on account of some family disputes this case has been lodged making false allegation. The petitioner is still ready to keep his wife. Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife, the petitioner, is directed to
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6737 of 2015 (2) dt.19-02-2015 2/2 surrender in the court below and the court below shall enlarge the petitioner on provisional bail, after issuing notice to the informant, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Kumari Khyati Singh, the Learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sadar at Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 187 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and the court below shall make efforts for reconciliation between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed and if the dispute does not resolve the court below shall pass order in accordance with law. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) KKSINHA/- U T