← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9809/2016bail granted

Guddu Tiwari @ Guddu Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2016-04-20Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9809 of 2016 (2) dt.20-04-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9809 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -79 Year- 2015 Thana -SAHAJITPUR District- SARAN ======================================================

1. GUDDU TIWARI @ GUDDU SINGH, SON OF JAI PRAKASH TIWARI AT CHHITAURI,

2. JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, SON OF LATE RAMFAL TIWARI,

3. SHRISH TIWARI, SON OF RAM PUJAN TIWARI, ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - CHITWANI, POLICE STATION - SAHAJITPUR, DISTRICT - SARAN.

4. UMESH RAI, SON OF LALU RAI,

5. SUNIL SINGH, SON OF DHARMANATH SINGH,

6. SAROJ KUMAR SINGH @ SAROJ KUMAR SINGH, SON OF KRISHNA SINGH, BOTH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - CHHAPIA, POLICE STATION - SAHAJITPUR, DISTRICT - SARAN.

7. TAJAMULLAH ANSARI @ TAJMULAH ANSARI, SON OF MD. HUSSAIN ANSARI,

8. NAIMULAH ANSARI, SON OF MD. HUSSAIN ANSARI,

9. AMARJEET SAH @ AMARJEET KUMAR SAH, SON OF RAJDEO SAH, ALL ARE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - MARICHA, POLICE STATION - SAHAJITPUR, DISTRICT - SARAN.

10. SAROJ SINGH @ SAROJ KUMAR SINGH, SON OF DHARMNATH SINGH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - MARICHA, POLICE STATION - SAHAJITPUR, DISTRICT - SARAN. .... .... PETITIONER/S

VERSUS

THE STATE OF BIHAR .... .... OPPOSITE PARTY/S ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghwendra Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Shahajitpur P.S. Case No. 79 of 2015 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 472 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9809 of 2016 (2) dt.20-04-2016 The accusation is of obtaining the loan by 26 persons including the petitioners by submitting fake Land Possession Certificate in the Bank.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, in fact, Land Possession Certificate submitted by the petitioners for loan is not forged and fabricated but he has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. Further submission is that petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chapra, in connection with Sahajitpur P.S. Case No. 79 of 2015, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T