Pawan Kumar @ Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55686 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2024 Thana- Vasudevpur District- Munger ====================================================== 1.
Pawan Kumar @ Sanjay Yadav son of Late Janardan yadav Village- Dalhatta Ps- Vasudevpur Dist- Munger 2.
Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Yadav son of Julum Yadav Village- Dalhatta PsVasudevpur Dist- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjiv Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 is a person with clean antecedent and petitioner no. 2 has antecedent of two cases and the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioners came to her house in an inebriated condition and started abusing, when her husband objected, accused Suraj, Anil, Rajesh, Kaushal and Sanjay assaulted him by brick causing injury on head, thereafter, the accused also assaulted her and her son by bricks and rod, further Suraj snatched her chain worth Rs. 75,000/- while Sanjay took out Rs. 3500/- from the pocket of her husband.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55686 of 2024(2) dt.04-09-2024 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioners and the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature and allegation of snatching chain and Rs. 3500/- is ornamental.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Vasudevpur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T