Indian Oil Corporation And ORS v. Nishant Kumar Trivedi And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.389 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 25584 of 2013 ======================================================
1. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Through its General Manager. Registered Office At G-9, Ali Yawar Jang Marg, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400051.
2. The Chief Area Manager, Indane Area Office, Patna, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Marketing Division) First Floor, Sahi Bhawan, Exhibition Road, Patna.
3. The Senior Area Manager, Indane Area Office, Patna Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Marketing Division) 1st Floor, Sahi Bhawan, Exhibition Road, Patna.
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. Nishant Kumar Trivedi. S/o Devendra Tiwari. R/o Village - Bijaipur, P.O.- Bijaipur, P.S.- Bijaipur, Gopalganj.
2. Amisha Kumari Srivastava, D/o Satyandra Kumar Srivastava, R/o Village - Bijaipur, P.O.- Bijaipur, P.S.- Bijaipur, Distt.- Gopalganj.
3. The Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and National Gas, Govt. of India, New Delhi.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Amlesh Kumar Varma, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 23-06-2015 This LPA has been filed for vacating the stay and not against the final adjudication.
In course of hearing of CWJC No.25584 of 2013 filed by Nishant Kumar Trivedi 1st respondent herein, the learned single Judge passed the order dated 13.1.2015 directing the Chairman of the Indian Oil Corporation, to himself file an affidavit and explain
Patna High Court LPA No.389 of 2015 (5) dt.23-06-2015 2/2 the matter, in the light of the observations made by the Court. According to the respondents, pleadings in the counter affidavit have already been delivered and they do not intend to add further.
The appeal was heard at length on 22.5.2015 and a request was made to the learned single Judge to take up the application for modifiying/vacating of the order. It was brought to out notice that through detailed order dated 22.5.2015, the learned single Judge modified the interim order.
In course of hearing, pleadings of the parties need to be taken into account, and it shall not be necessary for the Chairman to file any further affidavit.
With this observation, the L.P.A. is closed.
(L. Narasimha Reddy,CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) PNM U