Patna High CourtCWJC/3406/2015disposed

Jhaman Yadav @ Jhaman Prasad Yadav v. Union Bank Of India And ORS

2017-01-25Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3406 of 2015 =========================================================== Jhaman Yadav @ Jhaman Prasad Yadav, son of Late Dhano Yadav, Resident of Village- Pipra, P.S.- Wazirganj, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. Union Bank of India, through Chief Grievance Officer, 239, Vidhan Bhawan Marg, Union Bank Bhawan, Nariman Point- Mumbai-21.

2. Branch Manager, Union Bank of India, Gaya Main Branch, Dhami Tola, Gaya.

3. Chief Grievance Officer, Union Bank Bhawan, 239, Vidhan Bhawan Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai-21.

4. Chief Customer Care Officer, Union Bank Bhawan, 239, Vidhan Bhawan Marg, Nariman Point Mumbai-21.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Prasad Singh, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Nishi Nath Ojha, Adv. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 25-01-2017 Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has taken loan of Rs.5,00,000/- for the purposes of construction of his house from the Union Bank of India, Gaya Main Branch, Dhami Tola, Gaya. Altogether, the petitioner has returned Rs.2,87,500/- and there is outstanding dues of Rs.9,01,653.80/- upto 31st January, 2017.

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is ready to return the outstanding amount in equal installments of Rs.25,000/- per month.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3406 of 2015 dt.25-01-2017 2/2 Learned counsel for the Bank has not disputed the offer of the petitioner.

In such view of the matter, let the petitioner liquidate the aforesaid outstanding amount in equal installments of Rs.25,000/- per month along with interest which would added in the principal amount.

It is clarified that if the petitioner would fail to deposit three successive installments, the Bank will be at liberty to take legal action against the petitioner in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N/A.

Uploading Date 25.1.2017 Transmission Date