Abdur Rashid v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5108 of 2016 =========================================================== Abdur Rashid S/o Late Maulavi Salamat Hussain resident of Village - Govindpur (Dharam Dangi), P.O. - Sankola, P.S. - Abadpur, District - Katihar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Special Director, Secondary Education, Education Department, Bihar.

4. The District Magistrate, Katihar.

5. The District Education Officer, Katihar.

6. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Katihar.

7. The Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Patna through its Secretary.

8. The Secretary, Bihar State Madarsa Education Board, Patna.

9. Safiruddin S/o late Jainuddin resident of village - Berhakhor, P.O. - Sankola, P.S. - Abadpur, District - Katihar.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Rajeev Lochan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Krishna Kumar Singh, A.C. to G.P.22 For Madarsa Board :

Mr. Rashid Alam, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-10-2016 Without expressing any opinion on the merit of the claim of the rival parties, the Court may like to give the benefit to the petitioner taking into consideration the various communication and reports with regard to the status of the Madarsa in question to agitate the issue before the State keeping in mind the resolution of the Department of Education dated 23.09.2013 specially Clause-4. The petitioner is free to bring to the notice of such authority whether Clause-4 of the said resolution is required to be exercised in relation to the present set of dispute between the two

Patna High Court CWJC No.5108 of 2016 dt.18-10-2016 2 / 2 Madarsas. The early decision will be in the interest of early resolution of the dispute.

The writ application stands disposed of with the above observation.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) S.Kumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 21.10.2016 Transmission Date