← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53618/2023bail granted

Md. Safique Alam @ Md. Safique @ Md. Aziz v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-23Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53618 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-527 Year-2023 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Safique Alam @ Md. Safique @ Md. Aziz Son Of Md. Musa Ali R/o Vill-Baidanda,Gaji Tola,P.S.- Barari District Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Pronoti Singh,APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the bail petition in course of the day.

3. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 27.04.2023 in connection with K.Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case No. 527 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 27.04.2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 401,413,414/34 of IPC.

4. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 26.04.2023 the police apprehended two persons with motorcycle. They disclose their name as Nirmal Kumar @ Nirmal Sharma and Vikram Kumar @ Vikki. They told that they have stolen the motorcycle one night before with the help of their friend Anil Sharma. They also told that they sold

2/4 stolen motorcycle to Md. Safique @ Md. Aziz and Mr. Sakir. They also told that earlier also Safique had given stolen Glamour motorcycle to Suraj Singh. The police recovered and seized mobile phone from Vikram Kumar @ Vikki and one Super Splender motorcycle Number BR39AA-9681 from Nirmal Kumar and Vikram Kumar.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case on the basis of the disclosure made by the coaccused person. Further submits that from a bare perusal of the FIR as well as the seizure list that no incriminating article has been recovered from possession of the petitioner rather the recovery has been made from other co-accused persons and except the disclosure disclosure made by the co-accused persons, no other material has come during investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence and the police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 27.04.2023.

6. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner carries one more case other than the present one but fairly

3/4 submits that the petitioner is on bail in the said case.

7. Considering the aforesaid fact, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with K.Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case No. 527 of 2023, with the following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned

4/4 order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T