Dilip Parvat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56114 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2023 Thana- PANCHRUKHI District- Siwan ====================================================== Dilip Parvat son of Chhothu Parvat Village- Chandpur Ps- Pachrukhi DistSiwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghav Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Gun Sagar Mahto, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 13-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 498(A), 363, 365, 364, 120(B) of the IPC.

3.

Allegedly, all the FIR named accused persons have tortured the informant's daughter for non-fulfillment of demand of motorcycle in dowry. From 05.07.2023, she was missing. Informant has suspicion that all accused persons including the petitioner have kidnapped or killed her daughter. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. No offence as alleged has ever took place.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56114 of 2024(4) dt.13-12-2024 2/2 He has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is the husband of the informant's daughter. He and his wife was working in a factory as labourers and during working, wife of the petitioner developed relationship with another person. She left her house on 05.07.2023 and started living with that another person. The petitioner himself informed the informant about the missing of the victim. The petitioner has never demanded any dowry since marriage or before the marriage. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in custody since 31.05.2024.

5.

Learned counsel for the informant submits that he does not oppose the prayer for bail.

6.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/the Successor Court, in connection with Pachrukhi P.S. Case No. 299 of 2023.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) priyanka/- U T