← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13005/2022disposed

M/S. Hs Parmar And Co. Chartered Accountant, 303, Sumati Palace, Boring Road, Patna- 800001 v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-30Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13005 of 2022 ====================================================== M/s. HS Parmar and Co. Chartered Accountant, 303, Sumati Palace, Boring Road, Patna- 800001 through its Proprietor Kumar Vineet, aged about 39 years, Male, S/o Late Vijay Kumar Singh, Resident of 201, Shirisa Residency, B Area, Mithanpura, Naharpaar, P.S.- Jakanpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Registrar, Cooperative Committee, Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ayush Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Uday Shankar Sharan Singh (Gp19) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 30-09-2024 Heard the parties.

"1. That this Civil Writ application is being filed for issuance of appropriate writ/writs, direction/directions, order/orders and thereby for grant of following relief to the petitioner:- i. For setting aside the order contained in Memo No. 623 dated 16.01.2018, passed by the Registrar Cooperative Committee, Bihar, Patna whereby the petitioner firm has been delisted from the Departmental panel of Chartered accountant for audit of the Cooperative Committee in gross violation of Principle of Natural Justice as the imposed punishment was not at all mentioned in the show cause in Memo No. 67568 dated 18.09.2017 which was a mandatory requirement of law in terms of judgment reported in (2014) 9 SCC 105 'Gorkha Security Services Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.'

ii. For any other relief for which the

Patna High Court CWJC No.13005 of 2022(4) dt.30-09-2024 2/2 petitioner may be deemed entitled to."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the matter is of the year 2018 and six years have already lapsed, he will be once again approaching the Respondent no.2the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Bihar, Patna to show the bona fide as all the corrective measures have been taken by it, so that a fresh decision is taken.

3. The State-respondent do not have objection to that.

4. In that background, without commenting on the merit of the case, granting the said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) perwez/- U