Dinanath Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50936 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2022 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
DINANATH PRASAD Son of Late Tunnu Prasad @ Tanku Saw @ Tanuk Saw R/V- Bishunganj, P.S- Barabar Paryatak, Dist- Jehanabad 2.
Manju Devi W/o Dinanath Prasad R/V- Bishunganj, P.S- Barabar Paryatak, Dist- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Umesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Indu Kumari Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Jehanabad Mahila P.S. Case no. 12 of 2022 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 379, 506,34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the DP Act. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioners along with his family members have tortured in various ways to the informant and ultimately they ousted her after snatching her belongings. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are parents-in-law of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50936 of 2022(2) dt.15-12-2022 2/2 informant and have been falsely implicated in this case. They have never demanded any thing from the informant. They have no concern with the daily activity of the informant and her husband and are living separately. The sole responsibility to take care of wife is upon husband and not against his family members.
Learned counsel for the informant and learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Jehanabad-Mahila P.S. Case no. 12 of 2022, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Jehanabad subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U