← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4452/2016disposed

Subodh Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-06-20The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.4452 of 2016 (2) dt.20-06-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4452 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Subodh Kumar, Son of Sri Bharat Paswan, resident of VillageChehrakala Khurd, Post-Baksama, Police Station- Goraul, DistrictVaishali.

2. Birendra Paswan, Son of Sri Jai Kishun Paswan, resident of VillageChehrakala Khurd, Post-Baksama, Block+Police Station- Goraul, District-Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Vaishali.

3. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Vaishali.

4. The Assistant Engineer, Rural Works Department, Block-Goraul, District- Vaishali.

5. The Junior Engineer, Rural Works Department, Block- Goraul, DistrictVaishali.

6. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Ismailpur, P.S.- Goraul, DistrictVaishali.

7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Ismailpur, P.S.- Goraul, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mazharul Hassan For the Respondent Nos.1 to 5: Mr. Alok Ranjan, AC to GA 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 20-06-2016 Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned. Having perused the pleadings in the writ petition, which has been filed, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and upon hearing learned counsel for the parties concerned, we dispose of this application with a direction to the respondent No.2, namely, District

Patna High Court CWJC No.4452 of 2016 (2) dt.20-06-2016 Magistrate, Vaishali, to make an enquiry into the grievances raised by the petitioner and take necessary steps in accordance with law. The whole, exercise, so directed, shall be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order by the respondent No.2, namely, District Magistrate, Vaishali.

The petitioner may furnish to respondent No.2, namely, District Magistrate, Vaishali, a copy of this writ petition, which has been filed in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, along with annexures thereto and also a copy of this order. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision, which may be taken by respondent No.2, namely, District Magistrate, Vaishali, the petitioner shall remain at liberty to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. In terms of the observations and directions, this application shall stand disposed of.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) A.I./- U