Golu Kumar @ Chandan Kumar @ Chandan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49449 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-474 Year-2024 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Golu Kumar @ Chandan Kumar @ Chandan S/o- Shambhu Prasad VillageKharari PS- Nokha District- Rohtas at Sasaram ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pankaj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 87, 351(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 21-12-2024 at about 8.30 pm when he came back home, he saw his wife and petitioner in a compromising position, thereafter an altercation took place and the wife of the informant along with the petitioner abused and tried to kill the informant, but in the occurrence the wife of the informant got injured, thereafter the informant called on 112, accordingly an ambulance came and his wife was taken to the hospital, but

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49449 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 when he returned back home he saw the lock of the cupboard was open in which cash and jewellery were missing. 4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that wife of the informant has given an affidavit before the learned trial court, wherein she has stated that informant is a drunkard and comes home in a drunken condition and then used to assault her, further since petitioner and his family is her neighbor as such they used to save her from the assault of the informant, as such the present false case came to be instituted. It is thus submitted that wife of the informant has not supported the case of the prosecution. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nokha P.S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49449 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 No. 474 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T