Munna Patel v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6661 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2019 Thana- RAXAUL RAIL P.S. District- West Champaran ====================================================== Munna Patel S/o Suresh Patel @ Suresh Prasad R/o Village- Nayak Tola, P.SHarpur O.P. ( Adapur), District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar no.2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 22-06-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State through video conferencing. The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Raxaul GRP Case no. 50 of 2019 registered under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.
As per allegation in the F.I.R., it is stated by the informant that he along with his brother were going to the shop when two persons armed with pistol came from behind and made an attempt to snatch their bags. On the informant resisting, a third person reached there and ordered that they should be killed. One of them fired towards his brother. The informants bag containing Rs.42,000/ in cash besides other articles were snatched and the accused persons escaped on motorcycle. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6661 of 2021(3) dt.22-06-2021 2/2 that the F.I.R. was registered against unknown and the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of coaccused Guddu Patel made before the police. No incriminating article has been recovered from the person or possession of the petitioner. Inspite of being in custody since 25.6.2020 and charge sheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade.
The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case especially the fact that charge sheet has been submitted in the case without putting the petitioner on T.I. Parade, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Raxaul GRP Case no. 50 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rail, Bettiah, West Champaran.
(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U