Manoranjan Yadav @ Mannu @ Bhaskar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9305 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -201 Year- 2015 Thana -RUPAULI District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Manoranjan Yadav @ Mannu @ Bhaskar son of Ayodhya Yadav, R/o Village- Maini Yadav Tola, P.S.- Rupauli, District- Purnea .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Bidhu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gulnar Begum(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-09-2016 The petitioner being husband of the informant is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 498A, 307/34, 494 of the Indian Penal Code.

The basic accusation is of torture, performing second marriage and making an attempt to kill the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner admits his marriage with the informant. The second marriage was performed fifteen years prior to lodging of the present case. The informant is still residing in the house of the petitioner with children. On the joint prayer of the parties, vide order dated 12.07.2016, the matter was referred to the Mediation & Conciliation Centre of the Bihar State Legal Services Authority. The report of the Mediator at Flag-G dated 01.09.2016 reflects

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9305 of 2016 (4) dt.05-09-2016 2/2 that the issue could not be resolved due to the paucity of time. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue is on the verge of being resolved. The above contention of the counsel for the petitioner is not being controverted by the counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for three months on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Rupauli P.S. Case No. 201 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by learned Court below if the issue will be resolved between the parties within a period of three months. However, if the issue will not be resolved between the parties then petitioner will surrender and pray for regular bail. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Shageer/- U T