Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Yadav @ Vijay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56330 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2023 Thana- PALI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Yadav @ Vijay Yadav son of Late Naresh yadav Village- Nichali Gali Yadav Tola Ps- Rajgir Dist- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Ram Vinay Bind S/o Late Mahendra Bind R/o vill - Utar Serthu, P.s. - Pali, Dist. - Jehanabad ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhananjay Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammad Sufyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 24-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and Learned Counsel for the Opposite Party No.2.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Pali P.S. Case No.12 of 2023 lodged under Sections 363, 366A, 368, 370A, 372, 373, 376, 379, 411/34 of the I.P.C. read with Sections 3, 6, 8, 10 and 17 of the POCSO Act. read with Section 3, 4, 5, 8 and 9 of the Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the F.I.R. has been lodged against unknown accused person with allegation that the informant's daughter who is aged about 13 years, was kidnapped.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56330 of 2024(5) dt.24-01-2025 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the victim girl has left her house at her own consent.

5. Counsel further submits that petitioner is in custody since 01.02.2023 having clean antecedent. He further submits that the main accused, who has sold the victim, has been granted bail and the petitioner is only bare purchaser.

6. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

7. Learned Counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 is present and submits that all witnesses have been examined except doctor and I.O. of this case.

8. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

9. However, Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as earliest as possible.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T