Akhilesh Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8043 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -336 Year- 2014 Thana -GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Akhilesh Yadav Son of Late Navrang Yadav Resident of Village; Lakari Dargah tole Dudahi Bari, P.S. Barharia, District- Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Kiran Devi Daughter of Musafir Yadav Resident of Village: Pokhar Bhinda, P.S: Kuchai Kot, District: Gopalganj. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ganesh Pd.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 02-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 336 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 406 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner happens to be the husband of the complainant and admittedly, the marriage of petitioner was taken place with the complainant in the year 2006, but later on, differences cropped up between them. However, the stand of the petitioner is that he is still ready to keep the complainant with full honour and dignity.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8043 of 2015 (2) dt.02-03-2015 2/3 In view of the aforesaid submissions this anticipatory bail petition stands disposed of with direction to the petitioner to surrender and seek regular bail before the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj/ concerned court in connection with Complainat Case No. 336 of 2014 within four weeks from today and, if, petitioner does so, the concerned court shall release the petitioner on provisional bail for the period of six months on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned court and after releasing the petitioner, the concerned court shall issue notice to the petitioner as well as opposite party no.

2 fixing date for conciliation and shall take all possible steps to patch up the dispute of the parties within six months from the date of issuance of the above stated notice. It goes without saying that if the concerned court succeeds in his attempt, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed by the concerned court itself, but if the concerned court fails in his attempt, due to rigid and non cooperative approach of the petitioner, the provisional bail granted to him shall not be confirmed by the concerned court and in that event petitioner shall be taken into custody by the concerned court.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8043 of 2015 (2) dt.02-03-2015 3/3 opposite party no. 2, the concerned court shall confirm the provisional bail granted to the petitioner.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) Namita/- U