← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/13098/2022disposed

Krishna Kant Dubey v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-27The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13098 of 2022 ====================================================== Krishna Kant Dubey S/o Dwarika Dubey, Promoter of M/S Dubey Enterprises, Registered Office at Plot No. NS-5, Industrial Area, Buxar, Bihar, total area about 7500 sq. ft., R/o-Vill-Dubauli, Buxar, District-Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Industry Commissioner, Industry Department, Patna.

2.

The Secretary, Industry Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Managing Director, the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA), Udyog Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

4.

The Joint Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA), Udyog Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

5.

The Executive Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA), Udyog Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.

6.

The Deputy General Manager (DGM), Industrial Area, Patna Cluster, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA). 7.

The Assistant Regional Manager, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Industrial Area, Buxar.

8.

The Area In-charge, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Industrial Area, Buxar, P.S.-Buxar (Industrial Area), District Buxar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Kr. Pandey, Advocate Mr. Kritya Nand Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Subhash Prasad Singh, GA-3 Mr. Kumar Ravish, Advocate Ms. Siddhi Aashana, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 27-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

2/6 On 16.09.2022, we had passed the following order:- "Learned counsel for BIADA states that as

3/6 on date no 3rd party right stands created.

Statement accepted and taken on record.

As agreed, petitioner will file an undertaking to this Court to the effect that (a) within 60 days, petitioner will start commercial production in the Unit, should the respondents hand over possession of the premises to the petitioner/recall the order of cancellation, failing which petitioner shall give vacant and peaceful possession of the premises to BIADA; (b) within six months, petitioner shall make the Unit fully operational and functional in terms of the product sanctioned and allowed to be manufactured as per the original terms of allotment; (c) petitioner shall clear all the dues payable to BIADA as on date; (d) petitioner shall make itself compliant with all the statutory requirements, including the ones protecting interest of the employees; (e) in the event of failure on the part of the petitioner to comply with the undertaking, petitioner shall hand over the vacant and peaceful possession of the premises to BIADA with liberty for further allotment to 3rd party, when petitioner shall lose all rights therein and (f) petitioner shall be liable for initiation of proceedings for contempt for having violated the undertaking furnished to the Court.

Petitioner is ready and willing to furnish such an undertaking within next seven working days, failing which the petition shall stand dismissed for default.

Copy of the undertaking be supplied to learned counsel for the respondents.

However, BIADA has to recall the orders

4/6 passed cancelling the allotment of the premises. Let BIADA take a call on the offer made by the petitioner.

We are sure that the respondent BIADA would take a decision in the affirmative, which, in our considered view, would be in public interest as also in the interest of the State to generate economic growth as also provide employment to the people. List on 27st of September, 2022 so as to enable learned counsel for the petitioner to file an undertaking on affidavit to the aforesaid effect and till then no coercive steps be taken against the petitioner."

Petitioner has filed an undertaking being part of affidavit dated 21.09.2022 in the following terms: "3. That the petitioner undertakes as follows: a) Within 60 days, petitioner will start commercial production in the Unit, should the respondents hand over possession of the premises to the petitioner/recall the order of cancellation, falling which petitioner shall give vacant and peaceful possession of the premises to BIADA, b) Within six months, petitioner shall make the Unit fully operational and functional in terms of the product sanctioned and allowed to be manufactured as per the original terms of allotment, c) Petitioner shall clear all the dues payable to BIADA as on date,

5/6 d) Petitioner shall make itself complaint with all the statutory requirements, including the ones protecting interest of the employees, e) In the event of failure on the part of the petitioner to comply with the undertaking, petitioner shall hand over the vacant and peaceful possession of the premises to BIADA with liberty for further allotment to 3rd party, when petitioner shall lose all rights therein and f) Petitioner shall be liable for initiation of proceedings for contempt for having violated the undertaking furnished to the Court."

In view of the aforesaid, petitioner's undertaking is accepted and taken on record.

BIADA has no objection to the order being passed, as is so being passed in similarly situated cases to augment the industrial growth within the State of Bihar. Petitioner's undertaking that he would revive the unit within six months and make it fully operational and functional, is accepted and taken on record.

Consequence of breach thereof stands explained through the learned counsel.

This Court would not hesitate to not only initiate proceedings of contempt for violating such an undertaking, but also direct the BIADA to take over the possession of the

6/6 property for allotment to a third party in accordance with law. Present petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (S. Kumar, J) Amrendra/Anjani AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 29.09.2022 Transmission Date