Ranjay Sada @ Bijal Sada v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60160 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-369 Year-2020 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Ranjay Sada @ Bijal Sada Son Of Ram Jatan Sada Resident Of Vill- Bhirha, P.S.- Gangaur, Dist- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 325, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and later on, Section 302 of the I.P.C. was also added.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 24.05.2020, he is a person with clean antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant alleges that while she along with her three years old son were going to the temple, the petitioner intercepted and forcefully took the child and dashed him thrice on the PCC road

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60160 of 2021(3) dt.24-03-2022 2/2 and later, the child died. It is further alleged that reason for the occurrence is land dispute.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The child fell from a roof and the informant took the same as an opportunity to implicate the petitioner with whom, she is having land dispute as it has been also alleged in the F.I.R. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail application and submits that no mother would falsely implicate a person with regard to the death of her child. Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P. for the State, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T