Angrej Yadav @ Angrej Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6771 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2020 Thana- PRATAPGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== Angrej Yadav @ Angrej Kumar Yadav Son of Rajaram Kumar Resident of Village - Murli Ward No.01, P.s.- Kishanganj, Distt.- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arun, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Smt. Asha Devi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 24-06-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through video conferencing.
The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Pratapganj P.S. Case no. 88 of 2020 registered under sections 392 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegation in the FIR, it is stated by the informant that four accused persons on two motorcycles, on threat of arms dispossessed the informant of his belongings including the vehicle, Rs. 70,500/- in cash, a mobile phone, etc. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the FIR was registered against four unknown. The name of the petitioner transpired in course of investigation in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6771 of 2021(3) dt.24-06-2021 2/2 confessional statement of the co-accused made before police. It is submitted that no material has transpired against the petitioner. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession and he has not been put on T.I. parade. He is in custody since 6.7.2020 and has no criminal antecedent. The application for bail is opposed by learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has not been put on T.I. parade and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case together with the period in custody, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Pratapganj P.S. Case no. 88 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Birpur, Supaul. (Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U