Ramjee Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through The Vigilance Department, Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49022 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2017 Thana- ISUAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Ramjee Prasad S/O Haricharan Prasad @ Haricharan Raut, Resident of Village- Sikatti, P.S.- Isuapur, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Through The Vigilance Department, Bihar, Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dr. Shashi Shekhar Kishore For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anjani Kumar(L.O.Inc.Vigilance) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Isuapur P.S. Case No.229 of 2017 registered for the offence under Sections 420, 409, 467, 468, 471, 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he has been selected on the post of Niyojit Teacher on the basis of forged and fake marksheet.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was not aware about the forged and fake marksheet and as soon as he got the knowledge of the present F.I.R., he has left his job.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49022 of 2019(5) dt.25-02-2020 2/2 bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Chapra in connection with Isuapur P.S. Case No.229 of 2017 on the following conditions:

(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) nawalkrs/- U T