← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11163/2024disposed

Surendra Kumar 1 v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-29Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11163 of 2024 ====================================================== Surendra Kumar 1 Son of late Chittranjan Kumar, Resident of MohallaAshok Nagar, Road No.-3B, P.S. Kankarbagh, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Labour Resources Department, Bihar, Niyojan Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3.

The Director, Employment, Labour Resources Department, Bihar, Government of Bihar, Niyojan Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 4.

The Deputy Director, Employment (Establishment), Labour Resources Department, Niyojan Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhijeet Abhigyan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Standing Counsel 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER 29-07-2024 The petitioner is an employee under the Labour Department. He has been transferred from Patna to Madhubani.

2. In the instant writ petition, it is contended by the petitioner that he is scheduled to retire on superannuation this year itself. Moreover, he is suffering from ailment of Kidney, therefore, at the fague end of his service life, he may not be transferred to a place far away from Patna. It is also contended that in Patna, he is able to treat himself medically by good doctors. In Madhubani, such medical facilities is not available. He submitted a representation to the Director, Employment and Training, Bihar for reconsideration of his order of transfer but

Patna High Court CWJC No.11163 of 2024(2) dt.29-07-2024 2/2 the said representation has not been disposed of as yet.

3. The instant writ petition is disposed of, directing the concerned authority, i.e., respondent no. 03 to consider the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and pass a reasoned order relating to his transfer within 30 days from the date of communication of this order by the petitioner.

4. In the meantime, the impugned order of transfer be stayed till the disposal of the said representation (Annexure 5). (Bibek Chaudhuri, J) Suraj Dubey/- U