Patna High CourtL.P.A/1556/2014dismissed

Smt. Geeta Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-09Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1556 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 266 of 2013 =========================================================== Smt. Geeta Kumari W/O- Sri Upendra Sao, Resident of Madhopur (Purri), Ward No.- 5, P.S.- Akbarpur, District- Nawada (Bihar) .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner Magadh Range, Gaya

2. The Commissioner, Magadh Range, Gaya

3. The District Magistrate, Nawada

4. The Sub - Divisional officer, Rajouli

5. The Circle Officer, Akbarpur Rajouli, Nawadah

6. The District Programme Officer, District - Nawada .

7. The Child Development Project Officer Block - Akbarpur, District - Nawada

8. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat - Govind Bigha Block - Akbarpur, District - Nawada

9. The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat - Gobind Bigha, Block - Akbarpur, District - Nawada

10. Bindu Kumari W/O Sri Mahesh Paswan R/O Village - Madhopur, Ward No. - 4, P.O. - Paharpur, P.S. - Akbarpur, District - Nawada .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Advocate Mr. Raj Kamal, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. G. P. Ojha, GA-7 Ms. Priya Gupta, AC to GA-7 For the Respondent-10 :

Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 09-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Since on a fresh exercise done for selection of Anganwari Sevika in relation to the Ward, in question, private-

Patna High Court LPA No.1556 of 2014 dt.09-05-2017 2/2 respondent no. 10 has been selected and she is performing her duty in that capacity, in furtherance to the order passed earlier by the different authorities, it is left open to the appellant to assail the said appointment on grounds, which may be available to her. Nothing more is required to be done by interfering with the order of the Learned Single Judge.

Appeal has no merit, it is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) SKM/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE Uploading Date 10.05.2017 Transmission Date