← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3609/2017disposed

Anita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-08-01Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3609 of 2017 ====================================================== Anita Kumari W/o Mahendra Ram, Resident of Village-Baikunthpur Brahanda P.O. Ghatho, P.S. Ujiarpur, Distt. Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Director Education cum Joint Secretary, Patna, Bihar. 3.

District Magistrate Samastipur, Distt. Samastipur. 4.

District Program Officer Literacy Samastipur Distt. Samastipur. 5.

Block Education Officer Ujiyarpur, Samastipur, Distt. Samastipur. 6.

Principal, Utkramit Middle School Baikunthpur Brahanda, P.S. Ujiarpur, Distt. Samastipur.

7.

Sangeeta Kumari W/o Dilip Kumar Mahto Resident of village Baikunthpur Brahanda, P.S. - Ujiarpur, P.O. Ghatho, Distt. Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surya Narayan Roy, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Madhaw Pd. Yadav- GP-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2019 The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is non-payment of remuneration.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has regularly worked as Tola Sevak but she has not been paid remuneration since 19.09.2014 till date. The issue of payment of remuneration requires verification of the record and as such the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-District Programme Officer (Literacy), Samastipur to verify the records to ascertain whether the petitioner has worked as Tola Sevak or

Patna High Court CWJC No.3609 of 2017(5) dt.01-08-2019 2/2 not for the period she is claiming salary. In case, it is found that she has actually worked, the respondents shall ensure payment of salary for the period the petitioner has actually worked. Necessary decision in this regard must be taken by the respondents at the earliest preferably within a maximum period of 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U