Ranjit Singh And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11779 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2014 Thana -DUMRIAGHAT DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Ranjit Singh Son of Late - Deo Nandan Singh

2. Vinay Singh @ Vinay Kumar Singh Son of Late Raj Nanayan Singh

3. Vinod Singh @ Bhulan Singh Son of Ranjit Singh

4. Birbahadur Singh Son of Late Bhagya Narayan Singh All residents of Village - Dumariyaghat, P.S.- Dumariyaghat, DistrictEast Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Iftekhar Mahmood(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 354, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Accusation of assault and putting rope around the neck of the informant is against the petitioner Vinay. The informant and Laljhari Devi were also assaulted by

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11779 of 2015 (2) dt.23-03-2015 other accused persons. The accusation of causing knife injury on the head of the informant is against the petitioner Birbahadur Singh whereas petitioner Vinod Singh @ Bhulan Singh took out Rs. 11500/- from the pocket of the informant.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that in the background of land dispute the accusation has been levelled. Statement has been made in para-11 of the petition that neither the informant nor the Laljhari Devi received any grievous injury and there is a counter version of the occurrence.

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 37 of 2014, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Indian Penal Code.

The bail bond of the petitioners shall be accepted by the learned court below on verification of the fact that neither the informant nor the Laljhari Devi received any grievous injury and on filing of affidavit by the petitioners

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11779 of 2015 (2) dt.23-03-2015 that they shall regularly cooperate in the investigation. The violation of undertaking made in the affidavit will give liberty to the learned court below to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) P.K./- U T