Patna High CourtCWJC/6117/2015disposed

Veyas Kumar Singh And ORS. v. Sriniwas Singh And ORS.

2016-03-28Mr. Justice Mungeshwar Sahoo2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6117 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Veyas Kumar Singh. Son of Sri Rama Nand Singh.

2. Rahul Kumar. (Minor) son of Sri Ram Nand Singh, through his natural guardian and father namely Rama Nand Singh.

3. Rama Nand Singh. Son of Late Chhabila Singh.

4. Sheo Kumar Singh. Son of Sri Munilal Singh.

5. Munilal Singh. Son of Late Chhabila Singh. All are resident of village - Siswan Khurd, P.S.- Mairwa, District - Siwan. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Sriniwas Singh. Son of Ramashish Singh.

2. Vijay Kumar Singh @ Ram Balak Singh. Son of Ramashish Singh.

3. Kailash Patel. Son of Raja Patel. All are resident of village - English, P.S.- Mairwa, District - Siwan.

4. Harhangi Singh.

5. Jugal Singh.

6. Hari Narain Singh.

7. Harishankar Singh.

8. Panchdeo Singh. All from 4 to 8 are sons of Sri Ramdeo Singh. Resident of village - Siswan Khurd, P.S.- Mairwa, District - Siwan.

9. Madan Singh. Son of Khusi Singh. Resident of village - Siswan Khurd, P.S.- Mairwa, District - Siwan.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Udit Nr. Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER 28-03-2016 Heard Mr. Udit Nr.Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners.

By order dated 03.03.2015, the learned Sub- Judge- VII, Siwan only directed to mark documents produced by the respondents in Title Suit No. 240 of 2002 as there was earlier direction to that effect.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6117 of 2015 (2) dt.28-03-2016 2/2 The submission of learned counsel for the petitioners relates to reliability and genuineness of the documents. These matters cannot be decided in supervisory jurisdiction. However, the petitioners are at liberty to raise all these questions at the time of final hearing of the suit itself and if these points are raised the court below shall consider the same. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ application is disposed of.

(Mungeshwar Sahoo, J) singh/- U