Patna High CourtCWJC/21010/2014withdrawn

Matru Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-10-22Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21010 of 2014 ====================================================== Matru Yadav Son of Late Raghu Yadav, Resident of Village-Simra P.S.- Tikapatti, District-Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Katihar.

3. The Deputy Land Reforms, Katihar

4. The Circle Officer, Sameli, District-Katiha. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Aditya Abhishek, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. AC to SC-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-10-2016 After some argument, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, in presence of the learned AC to SC-18 appearing on behalf of the respondents, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to approach the Circle Officer, Sameli, in the District of Katihar under Section 3 of The Bihar Land Mutation Act, 2011 ( in short 'Act, 2011') by filing a proper petition in a prescribed format, after impleading all the necessary parties including the private individuals, if any, for grant of appropriate relief(s) to the petitioner with respect to the lands in question.

Permission is accorded.

The writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

If an appropriate petition under Section 3 of the Act, 2011 is filed in the manner indicated above, then the respondent Circle Officer shall be obliged to register a case for mutation of

Patna High Court CWJC No.21010 of 2014 (2) dt.22-10-2016 2/2 the name of the petitioner with respect to the lands in question and that shall be taken to its logical conclusion in accordance with law, but before passing any final order, reasonable opportunity of hearing must be given to all concerned including the petitioner and the other private individuals, if any.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U