Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6036 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2020 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== RANJAN KUMAR SON OF DHARMENDRA PASWAN R/O VILLAGE PADARI, P.S.- SHIVSAGAR, DISTRICT- ROHTAS.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kr. No.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 16-04-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual court proceeding. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceeding. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No.321 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 354(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 12(iv) of the POCSO Act.

As per the prosecution case, this petitioner along with one other has tried to kidnap the niece of the informant who went along with her mother to attend the call of nature in the evening.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6036 of 2021(2) dt.16-04-2021 2/2 On alarm raised by his niece and sister, informant reached on spot and villagers started beating them. Thereafter police arrived and arrested the accused on the spot.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to previous enmity. No wrong has been committed by the petitioner and there is no specific allegation of outrage of modesty of victim has been attributed against the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and has been languishing in custody since 12.10.2020.

Learned APP for the State opposed the bail petition. Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below, where the case is pending, in connection with Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No.321 of 2020.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T