← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/813/2016disposed

Lal Muni Devi v. The Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Through Its Chairman Vinay Kumar And ORS

2016-09-14Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.813 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9611 of 2011 =========================================================== Lal Muni Devi, wife of Late Maujilal resident of village - Karnapura, P.O. Sadisopur, P.S. - Naubatpur, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation through its Chairman Mr. Vinay Kumar (I.A.S.), Bridge Construction Corporation, Bihar, Patna.

2. Ashok Kr. Verma, the Deputy Chief Engineer, Bihar State Bridge Construction Ltd., 7 Sardar Patel Marg, Patna.

3. Mr. Arun Kumar, the Senior Project Engineer, Work Division, Gaya.

4. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, the Secretary, R.C.D., Bihar, Patna (Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna).

5. Mr. Ram Lal the Project Engineer, Sub-Division, Arwal B.S.O. Construction Corporation Ltd.

.... ....Opp. parties =========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr.Ramadhar Singh, GP 25 Mr. Upendra Pd. Singh, AC to GP 25.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

2. The present petition has been filed for initiating a contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 01.10.2015 passed in CWJC No. 9611 of 2011 requiring the authorities to consider the petitioner's case and taking decision at their end.

3. Though no show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement

Patna High Court MJC No.813 of 2016 dt.14-09-2016 at the Bar that the petitioner's representation has since been disposed of and against the final orders passed by the opposite parties, CWJC No. 9609 of 2016 has already been filed and pending before this Court.

4. In view of the aforesaid stand of the petitioner, the contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 21.09.2016 Transmission Date N.A.