Dashrath Das @ Dasrath Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55430 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-160 Year-2024 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Dashrath Das @ Dasrath Das S/o- Sahdeo Das All resident of villageBhagwanpur Taraura, PS-Mahua District- Vaishali 2.

Shivlal Das son of Bisheshwar Das All resident of village- Bhagwanpur Taraura, PS-Mahua District- Vaishali 3.

Surendra Das @ Pappu Das son of Dashrath Das @ Dasrath Das All resident of village- Bhagwanpur Taraura, PS-Mahua District- Vaishali 4.

Ranjit Das @ Randheer Kumar son of Mangilal Das @ Maujilal Das All resident of village- Bhagwanpur Taraura, PS-Mahua District- Vaishali 5.

Harilal Das @ Harihar Das son of Bisheshwar Das All resident of villageBhagwanpur Taraura, PS-Mahua District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Sudha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including these petitioners assaulted informant by means of lathi, danda, fists and slaps.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55430 of 2024(4) dt.07-10-2024 2/2 specific accusation of assault is against co-accused Amarjeet Das. So far these petitioners are concerned, allegation against them is general and omnibus. Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the nature of accusation and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahua P. S. Case No. 160 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T