Gango Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60691 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-251 Year-2021 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== 1.

GANGO SAH S/o Late Vashudeo Sah Resident of Pansalla, Bhairwar, Police Station- Muffasil, District- Begusarai. 2.

Lukho Sah Son of Late Vashudeo Sah Resident of Pansalla, Bhairwar, Police Station- Muffasil, District- Begusarai.

3.

Ramkeshwar Sah Son of Late Mahadeo Sah Resident of Pansalla, Bhairwar, Police Station- Muffasil, District- Begusarai. 4.

Ram Ishwar Sah Son of Late Mahadeo Sah Resident of Pansalla, Bhairwar, Police Station- Muffasil, District- Begusarai. 5.

Surendra Sah Son of Late Mahadeo Sah Resident of Pansalla, Bhairwar, Police Station- Muffasil, District- Begusarai. 6.

Dilip Sah Son of Fuko Sah @ Barhan Sah Resident of Pansalla, Bhairwar, Police Station- Muffasil, District- Begusarai. 7.

Babloo Sah Son of Futo Sah @ Barhan Sah Resident of Pansalla, Bhairwar, Police Station- Muffasil, District- Begusarai. 8.

Rohit Sah @ Rohit Kumar Son of Lukho Sah Resident of Pansalla, Bhairwar, Police Station- Muffasil, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.251 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60691 of 2021(3) dt.08-08-2022 2/2 present case and they have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is further submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides sustained injuries and the injuries are simple in nature. It is submitted that the occurrence took place on 21.04.2021 and the FIR was lodged on 26.04.2021, after delay of five days without giving any explanation.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Taking into consideration the facts that the injuries are simple in nature and there is delay of five days in lodging the FIR, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.251 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T