Ram Kumar Choudhary @ Ram Kumr v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2011 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -77 Year- 2017 Thana -BACHWARA District- BEGUSARAI ===========================================================
1. Ram Kumar Choudhary @ Ram Kumar, S/o Late Sogarath Choudhary @ Late Ram Swarath Choudhary, Resident of Village- Dadpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai.
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by order dated 24.04.2018 by the learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Begusarai, in connection with Bachhwara Police Station Case No. 77 of 2017 registered under Sections 302/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
According to F.I.R., six accused persons including the appellant fired at the husband of the informant as a result whereof he died. The post mortem report would reveal that only
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2011 of 2018 dt.06-07-2018 2/2 two fire-arm injuries were found on the person of the deceased. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is no specific allegation against the appellant and in fact the informant is not an eyewitness of the occurrence. The appellant is in custody since 18.01.2018.
Considering the entire facts aforesaid, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.
Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date10.07.2018 Transmission Date 10.07.2018