← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2383/2025disposed

Abhay Kumar Srivastava v. The Union Of India Through Sri Chhatrasal Singh, The General Manager

2026-03-18Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy,Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2383 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12571 of 2024 ====================================================== Abhay Kumar Srivastava Son of Late Shila Nath Prasad @ Lalanath Prasad, resident of village- Sundarpur Bela, P.O.- Lalbagh, P.S. - University, DistrictDarbhanga, presently residing at Hazrat Ali Road, Lakshmi Nagar, Ward no. 11, Kolhua Paigambarpur, Muzaffarpur, Pin - 843108. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through Sri Chhatrasal Singh, the General Manager East Central Railway, Hajipur - 844101.

2.

Sri Chhatrasal Singh, the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur. 3.

Sri Vivek Bhushan Sood, the Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Sonepur.

4.

Sri Pankaj Kumar Sinha, the Divisional Railway Manager (Personnel), East Central Railway, Sonepur.

5.

The Senior Divisional Mechanical Manager, East Central Railway, Sonepur. 6.

The Divisional Mechanical Manager, East Central Railway, Sonepur. 7.

The Chief Crue Controller, East Central Railway, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhav Krishna For the Opposite Party/s :

Manoj Kumar Singh (CGC) Ms. Sweta Suman, Advocate ===================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY) 18-03-2026 Heard the parties.

2. A show cause has come on behalf of opposite party no.4, Divisional Railway Manger (Personnel), East Central Railway, Sonepur and it shows that payment has been made and the order has been complied with.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the

Patna High Court MJC No.2383 of 2025(6) dt.18-03-2026 2/2 petitioner that some grievance is still there.

4. In view of aforesaid, the petitioner is granted liberty to agitate the matter before the concerned authority for the remaining grievance(s).

5. The present application is accordingly disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) HR/- U