Subhash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50766 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2022 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

SUBHASH YADAV Son of Satyendra Yadav @ Satyendra Prasad Resident of Village - Muhammadpur, P.S.- Goh, District - Aurangabad. 2.

Anup Lal Yadav @ Anup Lal Kumar Son of Satyendra Yadav Resident of Village - Muhammadpur, P.S.- Goh, District - Aurangabad. 3.

Mantu Yadav Son of Satyendra Yadav Resident of Village - Muhammadpur, P.S.- Goh, District - Aurangabad.

4.

Golu Kumar Son of Murari Singh Resident of Village - Muhammadpur, P.S.- Goh, District - Aurangabad.

5.

Chandan Kumar Son of Late Suresh Yadav Resident of Village - Muhammadpur, P.S.- Goh, District - Aurangabad. 6.

Uttam Kumar Son of Kamlesh Yadav Resident of Village - Muhammadpur, P.S.- Goh, District - Aurangabad.

7.

Gautam Kumar @ Bikram Kumar @ Vikram Kumar Son of Kamlesh Yadav Resident of Village - Muhammadpur, P.S.- Goh, District - Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Sri Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr.Adv.

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 379, 504 & other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, on 1803.2022,while the informant was sitting at the door of his uncle's house, all the F.I.R. named accused, including petitioners, armed with weapons, attacked the informant and his family members. They

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50766 of 2022(2) dt.19-12-2022 2/2 are also alleged to have molested the female members of the family and took away cash of Rs. 10,000/- from informant. Injury caused by petitioners are simple in nature. Case and counter case. Both sides sustained injury. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and there is no specific allegation of overt act against these petitioners.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Daudnagar, District - Aurangabad in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 73 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T