Arman Ansari @ Arman Miyan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48871 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2025 Thana- ADAPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Arman Ansari @ Arman Miyan S/o Gafar Ansari @ Gafafar Ansari R/o vill - Rampur, P.S.- Harpur, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar No.Iii For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Kishor Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with NDPS G.R. Case No. 65 of 2025, arising out of Adapur P.S. Case No. 161 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 20(B)II (B) of the NDPS, Act.

3. According to allegation, co-accused Md. Tabarak Ansari was arrested and 12 grams of brown sugar was recovered from his possession. Co-accused Tabarak Ansari apprised the police party that he was going to deliver that brown sugar to the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that the petitioner was not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48871 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 arrested at the spot and nothing was recovered from his possession. He has no criminal antecedent of similar nature. As a matter of fact, the petitioner had lodged East Champaran P.S. Case No. 44 of 2025 against co-accused Tabarak Ansari two months prior to the occurrence and due to this enmity, coaccused Tabarak Ansari falsely implicated the petitioner. The petitioner is under custody since 09.05.2025.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, is directed to furnish bail bond and on doing so, the court below shall release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS Act, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No. 161 of 2025, subject to the following conditions that the petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T