Soni Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18053 of 2021 ====================================================== Soni Kumari W/o Subhash Kumar Gupta, Resident of Village- Prempur Pathadi, Post-Kirhindi, P.S.-Shivsagar, District-Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, department of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director of Integrated Child Development Service (ICDS) department of Social Welfare, Govt. of Bihar. Patna.

3.

The Collector cum District Magistrate, Sasaram. 4.

The District Programme Officer, Sasaram.

5.

The Child Development Project Officer, Sasaram. 6.

The Selection Committee Chairman for Anganwadi, Centre-Prem Pathadi, Ward No.-1 Under the Block-Shivsagar District-Sasaram (Rohtas). 7.

Nitu Kumari Wife of Parmeshwar Gupta Resident of Village-Prempur pathadi, P.O. Kirhindi, Rohtas (Sasaram).

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikalp, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prashant Pratap (GP-2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 21-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1.e) For issuance appropriate commanding and directing to the respondent authority to appoint the petitioner being a suitable candidate.

(f) For issue writ of Certiorari quashing the appointment of Respondent no.7.

(g) For quashing of order passed in

Patna High Court CWJC No.18053 of 2021(2) dt.21-02-2024 2/2 Appeal case No.09/2020-21 dated 31.12.2020 by the District Programme Officer.

(h) For a direction to the respondent No. 3 to dispose the appeal No.16/2021 pending before District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the Ld. Civil Court having competent jurisdiction, for redressal of the aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U