Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50733/2022bail granted

Rakesh Raj v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-16Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50733 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2022 Thana- NARDIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== RAKESH RAJ Son of Rajendra Prasad R/V- Nagam Tola Shivpur, P.SFatehpur In the district of Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL ORDER 16-12-2022 This matter is heard through video conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner is seeking for regular bail under Section 439. He is involved in Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 169 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of I.P.C. He is in judicial custody since 16.06.2022. He is not involved in any other case. Investigation and further proceedings would take sufficient time.

In the light of these facts and circumstances the petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- to the satisfaction of Sri, Rajeev Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nawada in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case. No. 169 of 2022 subject to the following conditions.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50733 of 2022(2) dt.16-12-2022 2/2

1. The petitioner shall co-operate in investigation and in conclusion of the trial.

2. He shall remain present on each and every date of trial till conclusion of trial.

3. He shall not try to tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witness to delay the conclusion of trial.

4. In the event of default of two consecutive dates without any valid reasons, his bail bonds is liable to be cancelled.

5. The Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the case, at any stage, it is found that petitioner had concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below or investigating authority shall take immediate step for cancelling bail bond of the petitioner. However, acceptance of bail bonds, in terms of the aforementioned order shall not be delayed for this purpose or in the name of verification. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) shoaib/- U