Pawan Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46918 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-485 Year-2018 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE DistrictKishanganj ====================================================== Pawan Mahto S/O Bhim Mahto Resident of Village- Muri Bechi, Bibiganj, Police Station- Bibiganj, District- Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Manjula Devi W/O Pawan Mahto Resident of Village- MuriBechi, Bibiganj, Police Station- Bibiganj, District- Kishanganj ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Diwakar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashraf Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 498(A) of the I.P.C. Nobody appears on behalf of O.P. No.2, despite validly served the notice.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is ready to keep his wife with dignity and honour and that same is stated in paragraph 10 of this application.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46918 of 2019(6) dt.20-02-2020 2/2 as well as nature of accusation, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Complaint Case No. 485(C) of 2018, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) S.Katyayan/- U T